Fast Radio Burst Real-Time Spectral Theory

I found some math work in these FRB bursts being received.

The millisecond width of the FRB is all that needs to be known. Here is a sequence of numbers and they all equal to one another. The odd numbers that don’t repeat are another set of important numbers.

Most FRBs last for only 1/10th of a second

Or is it 1/1000th of a second. I forget.

Width (ms) burst duration is what really stands out for me..some interesting math work.

Must be a few different things happening from the source region to produce these kinds of equal sums.

If anything should look deeper into calculating the burst (ms) width in microseconds to see if those numbers truly add up

If you receive a repeated FRB batch sets. The longest (ms) width is the total sum.

Then the opposite could be counted in

The lowest shortest burst (ms) is used in calculating the sums up between bursts.

The frequency dispersion measure. Is not the key aspect to this. It really is the width (ms).

They don’t appear to be random numbers but meant to be calculated

I will be very shocked if I see the same things happening in these other frb121102 repeater pulses. I haven’t checked yet to confirm.

For years I held onto this data sheet I forgot which FRB 121102 repeater this was.

If these calculations exists thru out all the repeaters..

I know astronomers of the frbs believe there are different pulses occuring within the repeaters.. might be multiple objects independently producing those ms durations. But how can they be all equal sums..

I find this information very odd.

For years I’ve been trying to make sense of this calculating it in various ways.

After my time on zooinverse classifying space stuff. I was able to look at this GRB data and felt convince that I can find at least some good clues. And surely it took me less than a hour to make this rough color matching plot.

I figured since I’ve done pretty good classifying on zooiniverse let’s go back to the FRB data and give it a shot. Sure enough I felt confident that I could dissect it.

I can wager the other repeaters are doing the same sort of math calculations..

From what I gathered around the FRB community. Astronomers and enthusiasts alike all agree there is nothing that the data doesn’t follow any pattern. Other than the cycle that the FRB pauses for 16days and blast off more Frb repeaters..

Some ivy leagues say this isn’t alien because. This is a inefficient way to communicate.

Updated.

Next will work on calculating between the 9 burst themselves and also more of the burst arrival formulas

Everyone wants to know what these millisecond FRB pulses are.

Well there maybe some mathematical clues. Here

I see them as sets of burst in the millisecond time domain.

0.72 ms burst is small but still energetic.

For 0.72ms burst duration. This Feb can double triple our quadruple it’s length duration.

When all in doubt ask the Almighty A.I for some quick answers. (I suggest it’s the emission mechanisms myself from the progenitor) Because these are not random calculations but specific burst outputs unless some physical environments account for those but I highly doubt it. These are frequency dependant bursts

At 24 minutes of this video. The one professor talks about receiving a intelligent message which would not be understood as they receive the data in their recorders. Today we use more sophisticated technology than.. recorders

What potential instrument which receives mathematical clues is a coin toss

0.36ms seems to be a interesting number.

This number multiplied equals to mostly all the other Frb burst millisecond durations.

These are repeated.. milliseconds as well.

Repeated bursts. With repeated millisecond durations

0.36+ 0.36 = 0.72

Multiply by three and four and so on. And it comes out to the other burst millisecond totals.

It could be that all Frb repeaters are 0.36ms bursts. Rather being multiple events occuring at same time.

0.36 ms. Would have a smaller dispersion measure.

0.36 x 2 = 0.72ms

0.36 x 3 = 1.08ms.

0.36 x 4 = 1.44ms

0.36 x 5 = 1.80ms

0.36 x 6 = 2.16ms

0.36 x 7 = 2.52ms

0.36 x 8 = 2.88ms

0.36 x 9 = 3.24ms

0.36 x 10= 3.60ms

0.36 x 11 = 3.96ms

0.36 x 12 = 4.32ms

2.51 - 2.15 = 0.36

I’m still doing some calculations between burst possibilities. Seems mathematical milliseconds

Perhaps only doing a dispersion measure based on 0.36ms might yield results. But they said they localized this to a small region. Based off the dispersion measure.

I don’t know which burst dispersion measure they use to calculate the regions distance

Whatever case. The frbs are able to multiply itself in the millisecond duration. Something is able to multiply its duration.

To me sounds like the progenitor can put out short or long burst multipliers.

It’s like the progenitor is saying I’m going to put out a Frb that is 7 times longer. Or three times longer etc..etc